This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Bond
john.bond at icann.org
Mon Mar 17 12:39:02 CET 2014
Hello Anurag, On 16/03/14 10:11, "Anurag Bhatia" <me at anuragbhatia.com> wrote: >Hello everyone! > >Same seems with L root and few others. Do we have webmaster of the project >on mailing list? L-Root does not make a distinction between local and global. All of our nodes advertise the service supernets *without* the no-export community. We impose no policy on our hosts so they can choose if they want to announce our supernets to there upstreams and if so how. It is our observation that the vast majority if not all of our hosts do announce our supernets to there upstreams. Global and Local nodes are very loosely defined terms. However general consensus of a local node is one that has a desired routing policy which does not allow the service supernets to propagate globally. As we impose no policy we mark all nodes as global. Thanks John -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5079 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20140317/8fbdaa97/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]