This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Re: Outdated RIPE NCC Trust Anchors in Fedora Linux Repositories

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Outdated RIPE NCC Trust Anchors in Fedora Linux Repositories
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Outdated RIPE NCC Trust Anchors in Fedora Linux Repositories

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Feb 8 09:01:23 CET 2010

On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:38:56PM +0100,
 Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote 
 a message of 10 lines which said:

> ... or emphasize the point that the NCC's repository of the NCC's
> trust anchors is the true one and only authoritative repository for
> the NCC's trust anchors.

Very bad idea because it does not scale: I, sysadmin of a validating
resolver, certainly cannot go to 42 different https Web pages to
extract the one and only authoritative information. 

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Outdated RIPE NCC Trust Anchors in Fedora Linux Repositories
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Outdated RIPE NCC Trust Anchors in Fedora Linux Repositories

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]