This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Thu Dec 2 15:34:10 CET 2010
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Tony Finch: > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> > >> Me too. I think that the approach which Chris is suggesting > >> sits more in LIR territory than with the RIRs. > > > > What about legacy allocations where the DNAME needs to be placed in a > > reverse zone maintained by RIPE? > > I don't think such a case actually exists. Could you be more > specific? Ah, now I look they seem to be ARIN's zones. (Our allocations include 128.232, 129.169, and 131.111.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7, DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]