This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Fri Oct 16 19:41:58 CEST 2009
Jim, >>> Now us technical people realise those claims are beyond ridiculous. >> Actually, no. It _is_ technically possible to have tens of millions of names in the root (or any other zone). > David, you're playing with words. You referenced a paper written by ICANN staff, implying that in that paper ICANN staff was saying "let's move COM to the root". All I was saying is that that was not what the paper said. I even pointed out that the paper makes a distinction between what is technically feasible and what is operationally feasible. Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]