[dns-wg] Re: WG response to root scaling studies

On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:30:26AM +0100,
 Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote 
 a message of 25 lines which said:

> I didn't get a sense that the WG was coalescing around a particular
> point of view.

<Participant hat on>
Indeed. As a matter of process, it is important to keep in mind that
many people were not able to speak, for lack of time (we even
shortened the coffee break) and queue occupancy by the usual suspects.

I had, personally, many things to say. More on that later.

> [1] Do you think we should try to send some sort of statement to
> ICANN that could be fed into its decision-making machinery?

No.

> [3] If the answers to [1] are no, is there anything that this WG
> should be doing about making some response to the scaling study
> reports?

Congratulate the authors of reports where there was actual
measurements and data? More hard data is always fine. 

In the second report, for instance, I learned a lot about the
root (the vegetable).