This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: DNSSEC - DS RR provisioning
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC - DS RR provisioning
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNSSEC - DS RR provisioning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Sat Nov 14 02:52:00 CET 2009
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:57:36PM -0500, Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> wrote a message of 15 lines which said: > Only if you're willing to wait 2 years on .com to get signed. If you have a ".com", you will need to wait for ".com" to be signed + for ".com" to accept DS records (for most TLD which were signed, there was a non-trivial delay here) + for your registrar to accept and relay DS records (the experience with AAAA glue records makes me pessimistic here). So, yes, saying we won't need DLV after the root is signed is short-sighted.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC - DS RR provisioning
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNSSEC - DS RR provisioning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]