This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Tue Mar 10 14:51:42 CET 2009
* Elmar K. Bins: >> We are aware that around 1% of the servers we have in our list did not >> resolve to addresses, which resulted in these false positives. We are >> taking steps to ensure that we eliminate as many of these as possible in >> future probes. > > Actually, I personally would be more interested in more detailed error > messages, especially in the case of those false positives. We dream of > our stuff being always resolvable... I second that, especially if DNSSEC validation is involved. The current message format is good enough for trivial cases, but it's a bit terse in case of complex failure scenarios. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]