This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Sat Oct 25 20:03:20 CEST 2008

>> bingo.  as i said when it was proposed, dlv is just isc ego producing
>> root envy.
> Interesting conclusion. See, the way I understood it from Paul, is that
> it was not *meant* to scale, as it was an interim solution until not
> only the root, but large zones as .com got signed properly.
> 
> You're claiming that isc had both bad intensions and bad code.

no.  bad security model allowed by ego.

randy

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]