This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Oct 25 18:45:04 CEST 2008
David Conrad wrote: > DLV which I personally believe is non-scalable, non-standard, and > imputes a highly questionable trust model into _every_ non-cached DNS > lookup bingo. as i said when it was proposed, dlv is just isc ego producing root envy. >> my registrar (which still does not allow AAAA glue, I wonder how >> long it will take them for allowing DS). > You might want to consider changing registrars. as you likely know, the problem is opensrs, which is behind all the low-cost and open registrars. and we don't want to change to less open ones. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]