This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David Conrad drc at virtualized.org
Tue Oct 21 19:56:58 CEST 2008

On Oct 21, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Matt Larson wrote:
> This choice was a very conscious decision to avoid concentrating
> control of the KSK in any single organization.

That's not what I'm questioning.  I don't think any proposal is  
putting control in any single organization.  Given the importance of  
the KSK, the question is why would you ever want a situation where N  
is less than M.  It seems to me that lack of unanimity of the key  
(part) holders would be just crazy.

Regards,
-drc

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]