This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Manning
bmanning at ISI.EDU
Tue Oct 21 19:36:18 CEST 2008
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > >PS: thanks to the managers of ".br" and ".cz", the two first TLDs to > >appear in the ISC DLV registry. > > Why should these be in the DLV ? I'd rather see people configure their > resolvers properly. Will this cause people who use properly configured > resolvers to send DLV requests for those TLD's? > > Paul they should be in the DLV so that ISC can properly bid for being the root key operator. -- --bill Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]