This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matt Larson
mlarson at verisign.com
Tue Oct 21 15:29:42 CEST 2008
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:44:34AM -0400, > Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> wrote > a message of 18 lines which said: > > > This is why I think energy on this is better spent replying to the > > NTIA than here. > > [...] > It will probably have a stronger effect than carefully crafting a > reply which will probably be ignored, as all input from outside the US > has been ignored in all forums since the take-over of the root. I would not underestimate the effect of a thoughtful reply to the NoI. Since VeriSign interacts with the US DoC surrounding root zone maintenance, I know the staff there. They are clueful and I believe they want to do the right thing. I also believe that the NoI is a genuine request for information and not some kind of bureaucratic formality. Matt
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]