[dns-wg] NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:53:39PM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> Bill,
> 
> On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:09 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> >	thats ok, i said it was local.
> >	if you are not familiar with the roll of company/security auditors
> >	or the use of notory publics, then perhaps knowledge in that area
> >	would be helpful in understanding my concerns.
> 
> If you are not familiar with the way root zone changes are introduced,  
> then perhaps knowledge in that area would be helpful in understanding  
> how your concerns are misplaced.

	thank you for the educational update.  based on the published
	documents from NTIA, it has not changed since I was directly 
	involved.

> If you feel otherwise, please provide explicit details.

	I will be submitting a response to the NoI that will outline
	my feelings ... explict detail about my feelings are not 
	likely to be included.  my reading of the six proffered 
	models had, for me, a couple of clear winners, with one
	emerging as the clear favorite for adoption in the near term.
	others, including yourself, clearly have their own biases.

	i don't expect to convert you to the one true way and it is unlikely
	that i will suaded by your persausive enticements.

> It's way past time to move forward.

	Indeed.  Which is why it is important for each person to 
	review the NoI and provide feedback on the relative strengths
	and weaknesses in each proposal.  

	end of the day, any of the proposals could work to get the 
	root signed - perhaps as early as this calander year. 
	technical merit may not be the only factor.

	
> Regards,
> -drc

--bill