This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: rev delegation robot and selection of NS to pull zone from
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] rev delegation robot and selection of NS to pull zone from
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: rev delegation robot and selection of NS to pull zone from
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anand Buddhdev
anandb at ripe.net
Thu Nov 20 20:14:34 CET 2008
On 20/11/08 15:02, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: Hello Wilfried, > Another question regarding v6 reverse delegation, but possibly also > applicable to v4 reverse... > > One of our customers has a somewhat complex DNS setup which makes us > face the situation that in the SOA record the name of the NS where > the zone originates is not in the set of responses to NS queries. > > While this is not the common case, I presume, it seems to NOT be "illegal". > > The domain has to on-site name servers and is configured to have a slave > at the NCC. > > For this zone we received an alert that the ZXFR has failed from the > machine with the name given in the SOA. That box will never be serving > external zone transfer requests. > > So - this may just be a glitch in the alerting script, but I am still > left with the question: how does the robot at the NCC's end determine > the "appropriate" host to try zone transfers from? When the RIPE NCC's provisioning system sees ns.ripe.net in the list of name servers for /16 IPv4 and /32 IPv6 zones, it looks up the SOA record of the zone, extracts the MNAME from there, and looks up A and AAAA records for the MNAME. These are then used to attempt zone transfers for that zone. The provisioning system does not use any servers from the NS RRset. The provisioning system just generates configuration for BIND running on the ns.ripe.net cluster. It doesn't know whether a zone transfer will succeed or not. The recent alerts that we sent out to notify administrators of failing zone transfers were generated by a script, which took its input from BIND log files, where we have a record of failed zone transfers. The configuration you describe above isn't illegal. However, the RIPE NCC's provisioning system won't be able to cope with it. Currently, there's no way to explicitly provide a list of master servers that zone transfers should be attempted from. One solution is to list a server in the MNAME field which will provide zone transfers. Alternatively, you can choose not to use ns.ripe.net as a secondary - it is no longer mandatory for /16 IPv4 and /32 IPv6 reverse zones. -- Anand Buddhdev DNS Services Manager, RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] rev delegation robot and selection of NS to pull zone from
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: rev delegation robot and selection of NS to pull zone from
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]