[adm] Re: [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response

At 11:57 +0100 11/13/08, Peter Koch wrote:

>support, with another dissenting individual, who would still not oppose
>the text going forward as a WG statement.

Assuming I'm the dissenting individual - I had a talk with Jim 
yesterday.  My comments were strictly related to the words used and 
how they might be interpreted, not the point being made.  I.e., no 
substantive argument.  In the sense that editing anything means a new 
cycle of review, rewording for clarification would mean that there'd 
be no time for vetting, etc., and still get this to the NTIA in time 
- you can say that I agree with the message being sent (if not the 
exact words).

I didn't have time last evening to email about this conversation with Jim.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.