This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Nov 11 00:32:22 CET 2008

On Nov 10, 2008, at 23:12, Edward Lewis wrote:

> How about "While there may be reasons supporting the creation or  
> introduction of another organization in the process of signing the  
> root zone, the reasons are not technical in nature."

This pretty much says the same as what's already there, so no. In  
fact, your proposed text is far worse. It implies the WG concedes that  
there are reasons for adding another entity or layer of bureaucracy.  
That's not what we're saying at all,

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]