This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] final? draft of NTIA response

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] final? draft of NTIA response
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] final? draft of NTIA response

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Nov 7 17:02:44 CET 2008

On Nov 7, 2008, at 15:57, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

> so....   this response sounds a bit harsh.  let me clarify with a few
> more words. Although the draft response does not reflect my views, I
> accept it can go forward as a consensus view of the WG.
>
> I encourage folks w/ divergent views to respond to the NOI on their  
> own.

Thanks Bill. Much appreciated.

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] final? draft of NTIA response
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] final? draft of NTIA response

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]