This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Thu Jun 26 17:01:57 CEST 2008

>On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:28:09PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
>> At 19:53 -0700 6/24/08, David Conrad wrote:
>> ...polled -some- root server operators..

	Emphasis mine
> 
> If indeed the (ICANN) root server operators have misgiving about the 
> experiment, could someone operating a root server express the reasons?
> 

	two things here.  DRC didn't not poll -all- the 
	operators, only some subset that he selected.

	re misgivings about sanctioned alternate roots that
	remain persistant... discusssions go back atleast a
	decade - details in old rssac minutes.

	in this case, (one) of the concerns is the defacto 
	hijacking of the root zone editorial function - which
	is still done under contract/MOU wiht DoC and VSGN.

	Just one POV.

--bill

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]