This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: .SE releases report on consumer broadband routers
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: .SE releases report on consumer broadband routers
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: .SE releases report on consumer broadband routers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at cisco.com
Tue Feb 26 11:48:53 CET 2008
On 26 feb 2008, at 11.18, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> If they mess with DNS data, they are not routers (a layer 3 device,
> neutral with respect to the content), they are middleboxes (a layer 1
> to 9 device, able to break anything).
Well, it is more complicated than that. Many people do think that NAT
boxes are layer 3 devices, and if you have a double-nat mechanism then
"messing around with DNS packets" is a needed feature. Sure, then one
start walking from layer 3 towards layer 9.... But...
Anyway, this is not when we should fight about wording. We all know
what we talk about, and I think we should thank Patrik and others what
they have done.
Patrik
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: .SE releases report on consumer broadband routers
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: .SE releases report on consumer broadband routers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]