This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Mon May 14 18:45:04 CEST 2007
In the light of this: Jim Reid wrote: > So the questions for the WG should be IMO: > > * Is there value in having the NCC provide DNS service for big/important > reverse zones? > * If the answer to the above question is yes, under what conditions? ie > What do we mean by big or important? > * If the answer is still yes, should this service be compulsory or > optional? And under what conditions would optional use become compulsory > and vice versa? > * If the answer to the orginal question is no, what, if anything, does > the NCC do about things like lame delegations for reverse zones and the > operational problems these cause the NCC? I'd like to mention that slaving Tier 1 ENUM zones on ns.ripe.net is also purely optional only - for very good reasons. Some of them are hidden in Jim's questions. Best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]