This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Max Tulyev president at ukraine.su
Mon Feb 19 12:26:06 CET 2007

Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
> * Max Tulyev wrote:
>> Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
>>> * Max Tulyev wrote:
>>>> Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
>>>>> I do not see the need for crypto on the last mile.
>> ...if it is switched on, if it is at all routers, if the spoofer not in
>> the same ethernet (or other L2 broadcast) segment, if..., if..., if... :)
> 
> <repeat>I'm the ISP.</repeat>
> 

Me too.
But what is the difference?

-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]