This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
- Previous message (by thread): [techsec-wg] Re: [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Fri Feb 16 13:57:18 CET 2007
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 12:07:45PM +0100, Yuri Demchenko <demch at chello.nl> wrote a message of 110 lines which said: > What does DNSSEC and Techsec-WG people think about recently revealed > pharming attack technique that is based on the end user DNS > altering? I really wonder why do all newspapers present it as a DNS attack. It is an attack against a server (the home router). Once you control it, you can do many things besides changing the DNS configuration (such as setting up a tunnel and diverting all IP data through it, so DNSSEC would be screwed, anyway). > On the practical note, I need to say something definite to my > students what DNS experts think? As I said, the DNS is not involved at all in this attack.
- Previous message (by thread): [techsec-wg] Re: [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]