This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] getting DNSSEC deployed
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Swedish ISP TCD Song Adopts DNSSEC
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] getting DNSSEC deployed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Feb 14 11:55:05 CET 2007
On Feb 13, 2007, at 17:58, Randy Bush wrote: >> I very much doubt anyone's going to take responsibility for signing >> the root unless they know that, yes DNSSEC really does work and won't >> break the internet. > > bs. that is not the problem at the root. it's all layer nine. Nobody said this was an issue at the root Randy. And whether that's a layer-9 issue or not is irrelevant too: this genuine problem -- you'd presumably call it a non-problem -- has to be resolved somehow. Getting real-world experience of what happens when DNSSEC is switched on is part of that process. So the recent moves in Sweden are to be commended as a step towards getting that experience. I'm disappointed if you don't share that view.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Swedish ISP TCD Song Adopts DNSSEC
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] getting DNSSEC deployed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]