This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Leo Vegoda leo.vegoda at icann.org
Sun Apr 1 16:37:56 CEST 2007

On Mar 31, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Peter Koch wrote:

[...]

> Today, approximately 5% of all "inetnum" objects have at least one  
> "rev-srv"
> attribute. Of these objects, 17% have been changed in 2007 (which does
> not imply the rev-srv was changed or checked), and 35% were changed  
> in 2006
> or 2007.  That means "rev-srv" does not only appear in old objects,  
> but may
> still be carried as a legacy.  The objects with "rev-srv" are  
> maintained by
> 1300 different maintainers, almost 500 of which own only a single  
> object
> with "rev-srv".

Do you know what percentage of rev-srv records are fully or partially  
accurate?

Regards,

-- 
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]