This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
ISO3166 vs live ccTLDs [Re: [dns-wg] DRAFT RIPE 53 DNS WG minutes]
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DRAFT RIPE 53 DNS WG minutes
- Next message (by thread): ISO3166 vs live ccTLDs [Re: [dns-wg] DRAFT RIPE 53 DNS WG minutes]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Sun Oct 15 22:45:27 CEST 2006
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:17:14PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >They are there but they are "Not assigned". That always takes a while. > >For AX it took about a year if I remember correctly. > > Traditionally IANA has prioritized getting new ccTLDs on line once an > application has been received from appropriate parties in that country. it should be noted that defining the 2 letter ISO3166 code and delegating a ccTLD are different issues. There are two other codes without delegation (EH and KP) for more or less obvious reasons. > cc'ed David so that he can add taking that page down to the TODO list. The two 'pages' Hank missed have already been set up during the weekend. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DRAFT RIPE 53 DNS WG minutes
- Next message (by thread): ISO3166 vs live ccTLDs [Re: [dns-wg] DRAFT RIPE 53 DNS WG minutes]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]