This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
>>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Previous message (by thread): >>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] ns.ripe.net missing NS records
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
david.conrad at icann.org
Thu Nov 2 14:23:18 CET 2006
Hi, On Nov 2, 2006, at 2:50 AM, Max Tulyev wrote: > Yeah, I see the big difference and using double-standards about two > domains SU/EU are both not in ISO list :( Not sure where you are seeing a double standard. As I believe has been pointed out: http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code- lists/iso_3166-1_decoding_table.html If you look up EU, you'll see it is yellow meaning "Code element may be used but restrictions may apply", whereas if you look up SU, you'll see it is grey meaning "Code element deleted from ISO 3166-1; stop using ASAP". Seems pretty definitive to me. >> Maybe, it's time to start CIS TLD ? Why not? After all, we already have .CAT (Catalan) and .ASIA. Rgds, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): >>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] ns.ripe.net missing NS records
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]