>>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs

Seems to be reasonable. Could you please advice us a right place (mail
list?) to continue discussing political issues?

I'm digging iana/icann sites and still can't figure it out...

Peter Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:50:10PM +0300, Max Tulyev wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, I see the big difference and using double-standards about two
>> domains SU/EU are both not in ISO list :(
>>
>> But hope we can help to move it right way ;)
> 
> ... provided "we" != dns-wg, I guess. As David Conrad suggested, the
> policy issues are best dealt with through ICANN channels.  What this
> WG could address are the operational requirements and consequences:
> 
> 1) Is there an operational reason to phase out a TLD?

There is _NO_ operational reasons to phase out at least SU. It is
operational now and is growing fast. Is somebody disagree with me?



-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)