This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Thu Nov 2 11:30:47 CET 2006
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:34 +0300, Max Tulyev wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > >> This domain grows even it have huge price ( > >> http://www.nic.ru/en/index.html ). So people really need it. > > > > A) Wanting something is not the same as needing it. > > The magic is who decides what I need and what I don't need. That you _prefer_ .su doesn't mean that the TLDs it's been split into can't meet your _needs_. preferences != needs > > > B) My feeling is that what you're saying here (substantial > > registration growth in spite of the high price) speaks more to the > > motivations of the SU operators for maintaining their domain than it > > does for the necessity of keeping it in the root. > > Nobody push people to buy .SU domains. Only issue they do it - they need > it. Am I wrong? > Are anybody pushing people to avoid .su? I.e. how much effort are the .su-maintainers putting into convincing people to use the individual ccTLDs instead? ;-) -- Per Heldal - http://heldal.eml.cc/
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]