This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
david.conrad at icann.org
Wed Nov 1 19:49:44 CET 2006
Max, If you believe IANA should depart from historical and existing policies with regards to delegations and removals of two-letter top- level domains, I would suggest you initiate an ICANN policy development process within the appropriate supporting organization (s). Until that time, IANA is pretty much constrained to follow existing policies despite the fact that some people might be making money registering names for a country that no longer exists. Rgds, -drc On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:13 AM, Max Tulyev wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > >> My point is, we actually do have a policy here, and the SU operators >> are running their operation with deliberate disregard for it. If you >> don't like the policy, there are places to debate it, however since >> this isn't one of them, I think I'll leave it at that. > > You also can take a look at official SU statistics, for example, > previous month: > > http://stat.nic.ru/en_su/2006/10/31/trend-20061031.shtml > http://stat.nic.ru/en_su/2006/10/31/summ_trend-20061031.shtml > > This domain grows even it have huge price ( > http://www.nic.ru/en/index.html ). So people really need it. > > -- > WBR, > Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO) >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]