[dns-wg] Re: Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute

On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:22, Havard Eidnes wrote:

> While I can agree that out of completeness it is good to have the
> support for glue records in the software, I still wonder if
> anyone has specifically asked for being able to name the name
> servers for these delegation points within the delegated domain?

Yes. I'm probably the guilty one who started this. ENUM delegations  
use the same process and templates as reverse delegation. When  
4.4.e164.arpa got delegated years ago, in-bailiwick glue was  
requested and I was surprised that wasn't then possible. Carsten was  
the NCC's Mr. ENUM at the time. He might well remember kludging a  
workaround for that problem.