This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Fri Sep 30 16:47:17 CEST 2005
On 30.09 13:19, Paul Herman wrote: > example.com. 3600 SOA dns.private.example.com. <======== > ... > dns.private A 10.11.12.13 <======= > > So far so good. Our zone appears to be fully RFC compliant. RFC1918: "Indirect references to such addresses should be contained within the enterprise. Prominent examples of such references are DNS Resource Records and other information referring to internal private addresses. In particular, Internet service providers should take measures to prevent such leakage." Daniel (who iremebers writing the words cited above)
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]