This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Tue Oct 4 12:09:48 CEST 2005
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:12:40AM +0200, MÃ¥ns Nilsson wrote: > 1035 says: > > MNAME The <domain-name> of the name server that was the > original or primary source of data for this zone. > > I think this is supportive of the idea that questions about the zone SHOULD > be answered, and that AA bit SHOULD be set. "primary" source I'd not read as the "source that's mostly asked", but in the sense the word is used in "primary master". To comply with the above definition, it's sufficient to supply the zone to at least one secondary (ususally by AXFR). So even when 1035 was not explicitly designed to support hidden primaries, it is flexible enough to allow for them. The update to 1035 in RFC 1996 makes this even clearer. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]