This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation

• Previous message (by thread): Document management & review (was Re: [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation)
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC Service Interruption on 29 September

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Max Tulyev president at ukraine.su
Mon Oct 3 08:38:13 CEST 2005

Hi!


>      example.com.  3600  SOA  dns.private.example.com.
[skip]
>      dns.private A  10.11.12.13

This is a problem.

Why should not use VIEW mechanism in BIND or same in other DNS'es to make your 
10.x.x.x visible only for your 10.x.x.x clients? By the way, it makes your 
network more secure.

-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)

• Previous message (by thread): Document management & review (was Re: [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation)
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC Service Interruption on 29 September

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]