[dns-wg] Followup to IANA TLD delegation problem

Jim,
what we might also want to know is the complete time table of the problem. 
And how the initial information came. As I maintain a daily report on the 
top zone, I am interested to know if this kind a problem can be watched for 
and how.
thank you.
jfc

At 12:18 30/05/2005, Jim Reid wrote:
> >>>>> "Olivier" == Olivier Guillard / AFNIC <Olivier.Guillard at nic.fr> writes:
>
>     Olivier> It is not perfectly clear for me what kind of
>     Olivier> contribution you are waiting for to help moving forward,
>     Olivier> and the kind of actions you see as conceivable to be
>     Olivier> undertaken by the dns-wg ?
>
>My apologies for any confusion Olivier. My earlier mail was intended
>to provoke a discussion on the list. This discussion would hopefully
>allow the WG to reach consensus on: (a) if there were outstanding
>issues along the lines of the questions I posed; and (b) what the WG
>felt the next steps to resolve those issues could be. The response so
>far seems to be that further clarification is required but it's not
>critical. So if that's the consensus of the WG, the promised response
>from Doug could well be enough to close this issue.
>
>It's really up to the WG to decide what happens. If nobody cares, we
>just let things drop. If it's felt to be *really* important, then the
>WG could make another formal communication to ICANN/IANA. If the
>consensus is somewhere in between these two extremes, it may well be
>enough to wait for Doug's reply to my questions. As WG chair, I'd just
>like to find out what the WG's position is.