This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue Jun 7 17:47:43 CEST 2005

> >	now if i understood Ed, both he and you are tangentially
> >	arguing for in-baliwick glue.  why was this considered such
> >	bad practice last decade, but now seems to be not only
> >	prefered but the only choice for right-thinking people?
> 
>    dig @f.gtld-servers.com figwort.arin.net a
> 
> (Meant as an example only.  Look at the flags, no RA, no AA, but 
> ANCOUNT > 0 and the rest of the message looks like a referral.)
> 
> This crutch will have to be removed for DNSSEC (or DNSSEC will have 
> to bend around it).  When the crutch is removed, antique name servers 
> will start to fall over.

	just for grins... how would DNSSEC "bend" around this 
	supporting girder (or crutch if you prefer).

> Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468

--bill

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]