This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jorgensen
rogerj at jorgensen.no
Thu Feb 24 22:42:44 CET 2005
sorry for replying to this to all of the mailinglist. On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: <znip: > > inet6num: 2001:07FD::/32 > netname: K-rootserver-net-20030829 > descr: This assignment given to k-root.server.net > > I believe this ASSIGNment is in violation of existing IPv6 ALLOCATION > policies. I would be very interested in learning any information to the > contrary. This is pointless discussion, only point of it would maybe be to making it clear that the VERY few DNS _root-servers_ there are out there, are the ONLY thing important enough to get it's own /32. -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | rogerj at stud.cs.uit.no | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]