This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Feb 24 20:55:10 CET 2005
On 24-feb-05, at 20:04, Daniel Roesen wrote: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6-rootservers.html > "Under this policy, each (current or future) Internet DNS root server > (as listed in the root-servers.net zone) in the RIPE region will be > assigned a block of IPv6 address space for purposes of root server > operations. The size of the block shall be the same as the size of the > minimum allocation to Local Internet Registries (LIRs) valid at the > time > of the root server assignment." So who authorized this? It looks a lot like the RIPE NCC doesn't have to stick to its own rules when it doesn't feel like it. And it's extremely wasteful to use 2^96 addresses when only 1 is needed.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]