This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcos Sanz/Denic
sanz at denic.de
Tue Aug 23 16:56:49 CEST 2005
Olaf, Jim, all, > Colleagues, you may recall Olaf posted a proposal to the list a few > weeks ago. It was about changes to the in-addr.arpa delegation > process to accommodate DNSSEC. In other words, updates to the > templates and database to allow for keying material, additional > checks at the NCC, etc, etc. To my eyes the proposal is good and I am happy somebody is taking the plunge. Congratulations. Two comments: http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/dnssec/key-maintenance-procedure.html To a layman, the meaning of DLV can't be tracked down. A reference missing? http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/dnssec/registry-procedure.html I suggest making the ds-rdata attribute an [inverse key] Best regards, Marcos
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]