This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] AAAA lookup misbehaviour
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] AAAA lookup misbehaviour
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Document to discuss for RIPE 49
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Thu Sep 9 11:12:41 CEST 2004
On 8 Sep, 2004, at 13:05, David Malone wrote: > As the next RIPE meeting is rolling up, I just thought I'd raise > the AAAA lookup misbehaviour thread again. To briefly remind you > of where we'd got to: > > 1) I'd written up a short describing the problem > with authoritative servers and recommending that > new name servers should be tested before deployment. > 2) Alvaro and Colm had highlighted some problems with > client resolver libraries, but it wasn't clear if > a description of these problems should live in the > same document. > 3) We were trying to figure out what action could be > taken to encourage people to fix existing problem > name servers. > > So, other than the hall of shame, what options do we have to > encourage people to fix their software? Writing a RIPE document. People use them as reference material when they are well written, both within and outside the RIPE region > Working with vendors > of DNS solutions is certainly a good idea, and the dns-wg's > name could be useful when convincing vendors to take action. > Sure, buy me a beer. I am easy to convince :-) Now seriously, we try to do the right thing, we may have bugs some times. For instance there was some time ago a bug that went like this: 1679. [bug] When there was a single nameserver with multiple addresses for a zone not all addresses were tried. [RT #11706] e.g. If the server had one AAAA and one A, then A would not be tried. They will mark all addresses bad if they get a bad response from one of the addresses (bad response != no response). Although you could argue this goes in your favour as IPv6 promoter. > Another possibility would be to recommend that when problem > DNS servers are found, then they should be considered lame > and so dropped from the advertised list of NSs for a zone. > Well, that would depend on the nature of the misbehaviour. I am looking forward to your DNS-wg contribution. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] AAAA lookup misbehaviour
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Document to discuss for RIPE 49
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]