This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Kurt Erik Lindqvist kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Sun Oct 24 14:11:09 CEST 2004

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-10-22, at 13.26, Markus Grundmann/ORSN wrote:

>
>> You can't have it both ways. Either you have an independent
>> root-zone, or
>> it is ICANN based. If you have any technical concerns about the
>> database management of the ICANN sanctioned servers, then you would
>> have a
>> point if the argument would be valid. It seems to me however you have
>> political concerns with regards to database management (as in who
>> manages
>
> Yes! ORSN has an political background but I think that is not bad.
> Projects like ORSC (*ggrr*) undermines DNS. ! And not ORSN !

And your added value is? Besides increased risk of serving false data,
and spreading FUD?

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQXucC6arNKXTPFCVEQJJ0QCgndWaOKDLQGxiFVQFT0QjLww2ItIAoKtz
DdPYtohQdFFxFUwa26enTB5M
=eKeD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]