This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Jumping the gun on SIDN!
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Jumping the gun on SIDN!
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] ripe policy about reverse dns?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jakob Schlyter
jakob at rfc.se
Thu Oct 28 22:39:47 CEST 2004
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Pim van Pelt wrote: > nsauth1.bit.nl. 86400 IN A 213.136.12.51 > nsauth2.bit.nl. 86400 IN A 213.136.12.59 > nsauth3.bit.nl. 86400 IN A 212.204.192.11 > nsauth1.bit.nl. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:7b8:3:2c::53 > nsauth2.bit.nl. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:7b8:3:2d::53 > nsauth3.bit.nl. 86400 IN AAAA 2001:898:1001:1003::53 IIRC there are still bind8 server out there that will choke on zone where all nameservers have both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses - it might be a good idea to keep at least one IPv4-only server. jakob
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Jumping the gun on SIDN!
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] ripe policy about reverse dns?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]