This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Oct 27 12:23:04 CEST 2004
I have been talking about nothing *but* ccTLDs in Europe, and how this flat namespace model will not continue to scale. > Plus the fact that a generic, worldwide and *flat* TLD like > .com still hasn't grown such as to become unmanageable? It has grown to the point where it is not manageable. It was unmanageable a long time ago, and things have been going further down the toilet ever since. Yeah. Tell Verisign that they cannot run a nameserver for .com. And you're going to have a problem that will be an order of magnitude larger than .com. It will be quite a while befor an other TD will hit the 30M domain count ad the info, biz, and other gTLDs have showed. jaap
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]