This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Oct 27 11:14:14 CEST 2004
> At the very least, any policy that prohibits two-letter SLDs (on=20
> the basis of potential conflicts with ccTLDs) should acknowledge this=20
> future problem.
How about: "At the present rate-of-change of ISO 3166-1, we must solve
the problems mentioned in RFC 1535 at some time in the next six hundred
years"? :)
If I read 1535 correctly, it deals with setting up a correct search list for a
resolver. It doesn't deal with ccTLD domains.
jaap
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]