This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Tue Oct 26 10:14:17 CEST 2004
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:40:58AM +0200, Lasse Jarlskov <lasse at jarlskov.dk> wrote a message of 19 lines which said: > I always thought that ccTLDs could only be assigned if they are on > ISO-3166-1. Indeed thats what http://www.icann.org/icp/icp-1.htm > says. And before that, RFC 1591. But both these documents do not handle the case of disappearing countries (see .SU and .YU). Most Internet users want stable names and therefore would not agree with the disparition of a domain. > Yet, acording to > http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html > EU is not on that list. Rules always have exceptions :-) In Europe, see .AC, .GG, .IM and .JE, which are in the root but were never in ISO-3166 (I always mention this when people say that things were better with Jon Postel).
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]