This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Oct 25 17:04:01 CEST 2004
>>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org> writes: Brad> Oh, wait -- they bought the business from Nominum, who Brad> was using ANS for their customers, and UltraDNS almost Brad> certainly still using ANS today.... Sorry Brad you are quite wrong. UltraDNS have never used Nominum's ANS. However there was a brief transition period after the GNS hosting business was sold when GNS customers still used its ANS-based service until they got migrated to the UltraDNS platform. Even then, I'm fairly sure that Nominum remained in control of the GNS infrastructure throughout that migration exercise. My understanding was that UltraDNS was primarily interested in the GNS customer base. Besides, since they already had their own DNS implementation they had no real need for Nominum's ANS. UltraDNS didn't need the GNS infrastructure either, since they already had their own. To the best of my knowledge UltraDNS has always run its hosting service on its own DNS implementation.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]