This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sun Oct 24 13:05:47 CEST 2004
On 21-okt-04, at 11:05, Brad Knowles wrote: > Nevertheless, given the size of the population of the expanded EU, I > don't see how this kind of scheme will scale well to handle > potentially hundreds of millions of people. I don't think you > necessarily need to go to a US-style city.county.state.us mechanism, > but I think a three-level domain scheme would definitely be advisable. It is extremely unlikely that this will provide any benefits, as I don't see how it would be possible to make the largest subdomain of .eu at least an order of magnitude smaller than .eu as a whole, without defeating the purpose of having a Europe-wide TLD in the first place. For instance, see http://www.nominet.org.uk/Statistics/RegistrationStatistics/ Around 90% of all registered .uk domains are .co.uk domains.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]