This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brad Knowles
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Thu Oct 21 13:53:26 CEST 2004
At 1:19 PM +0200 2004-10-21, Piet Beertema wrote: > Which is short-sighted. What's the use of blocking only *existing* > ccTLD codes, when nobody can foresee what new ccTLD codes may come > to exist in the future? We've seen enough recent examples... Okay, so block all two and three-letter SLDs, under the assumption that if they aren't already valid TLDs, they might become valid TLDs in the future. That would cause problems for ibm.eu, but would guarantee that you can prevent .com.eu from being registered (as one example). However, you'd then also have to block all four-letter SLDs, because there are current TLDs with four letters (.aero and .name). How far would you be willing to take this? -- Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]