This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steffen Reithermann
dns-wg at Reithermann.de
Wed Oct 13 12:54:58 CEST 2004
Hello, On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:04:33PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:28:57AM +0200, > Roy Arends <roy at dnss.ec> wrote > > Please read RFC 2826 > > Please read about ORSN > (http://european.nl.orsn.net/faq.php#opmode). ORSN is *not* an > alternative root. if I read it correctly, ORSN *is* an alternative root, e.g. they say "However, removed TLDs won't be considered ..." in the FAQ you mentioned above, so even in the so-called "ICANN-based mode" there might be a different content of the root zone compared to the official root zone. This might get much worse in the "independent mode" since ORSN is an independent organization with no clear transparency regarding decisions and control of the root zone's content. Besides the technical reason above this is another administrative reason why I would call ORSN an alternative root. Don't get me wrong ... I don't say ICANN's decisions are transparent all or even most of the time. Some independence of Europe regarding DNS and other critical Internet infrastructure is a creditable goal, but I think it needs a stronger basis and a broader support in the ISP community than ORSN seems to have currently. -- Steffen Reithermann
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]