This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed Jul 21 11:45:39 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-07-21, at 11.11, Jim Reid wrote: > > Jeroen> BTW that list is missing i.root-servers.org which is > Jeroen> located in Sweden, but that is a testing address and > Jeroen> routes over the US instead of staying inside Europe... > > Why does it matter where a root name server is physically located? > Sorry, I should rephrase that: why does it matter where a route for a > root name server gets announced? > > IMO a 200ms RTT over IPv6 has to be better than an infinite RTT. Although I agree in principle from a DNS perspective - the high RTT in most occasions indicates tunneling. And although tunneling per-se is not that bad, it is much more vulnerable to problems in the underlaying routing and most of all, much harder to diagnose from the "outside". - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQP47R6arNKXTPFCVEQIVIACfT2aoJQviSEoGlOhI1/gFn7ZuXpkAoIsP NclE/WfB/ZG6tAHIQvofpi/X =1IjQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]