This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Fwd: [enum-wg] Tier-2 provisioning: NS vs CNAME/DNAME

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Fwd: [enum-wg] Tier-2 provisioning: NS vs CNAME/DNAME
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Fwd: [enum-wg] Tier-2 provisioning: NS vs CNAME/DNAME

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Brad Knowles brad.knowles at skynet.be
Thu Jul 15 14:46:16 CEST 2004

At 12:48 PM +0100 2004-07-15, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

>  If registrars or T2 registries can't do their job, how long will they stay
>  in business ?

	If the current amount of policing we're getting from ICANN is any 
example, then the answer is "surprisingly long".  Just ask Network 
Solutions.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

     -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
     Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

   SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Fwd: [enum-wg] Tier-2 provisioning: NS vs CNAME/DNAME
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Fwd: [enum-wg] Tier-2 provisioning: NS vs CNAME/DNAME

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]